2007 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2004 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2007 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2007 Chevrolet Malibu. (144 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2007 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2004 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Chevrolet Malibu. (206 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chevrolet Malibu | 2004 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Malibu | Econoline |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3510 mm |