2007 Chevrolet Matiz vs. 1968 Mazda R-100
To start off, 2007 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1968 Mazda R-100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda R-100 (110 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2007 Chevrolet Matiz. (65 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda R-100 should accelerate faster than 2007 Chevrolet Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda R-100 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2007 Chevrolet Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mazda R-100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda R-100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda R-100 (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Chevrolet Matiz. (91 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1968 Mazda R-100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Chevrolet Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chevrolet Matiz | 1968 Mazda R-100 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Matiz | R-100 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1968 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 995 cc | 1963 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 91 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 795 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2270 mm |