2007 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 2009 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Chevrolet Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Chevrolet Rezzo would be higher. At 2,361 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2007 Chevrolet Rezzo. (120 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2007 Chevrolet Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Chevrolet Rezzo weights approximately 26 kg more than 2009 Toyota Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Chevrolet Rezzo. (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Chevrolet Rezzo | 2009 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Rezzo | Matrix |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2361 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1381 kg | 1355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |
