2007 Chrysler 300 vs. 1967 Jaguar 240

To start off, 2007 Chrysler 300 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler 300 (246 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240.

Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler 300 (341 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Chrysler 300 1967 Jaguar 240
Make Chrysler Jaguar
Model 300 240
Year Released 2007 1967
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3518 cc 3442 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 246 HP 208 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 341 Nm 300 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 5010 mm 4540 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 3060 mm 2740 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 54 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]