2007 Chrysler 300 vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2007 Chrysler 300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 2007 Chrysler 300. (243 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2007 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 337 kg more than 2003 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (529 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Chrysler 300. (340 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler 300 | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | Mustang |
Year Released | 2007 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 243 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 529 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 8.5:1 |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |