2007 Chrysler 300 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2007 Chrysler 300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler 300 (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 2004 Ford Mustang. (261 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler 300 (570 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Mustang. (410 Nm). This means 2007 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler 300 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | Mustang |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6059 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 410 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 103 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 59 L |