2007 Chrysler 300 vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2007 Chrysler 300 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler 300 (340 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 724 kg more than 2007 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler 300 (530 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm). This means 2007 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler 300 | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | 300 | Armada |
Year Released | 2007 | 2005 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 530 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.5 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 92 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 2344 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 106 L |