2007 Chrysler 300 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2007 Chrysler 300 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler 300 (429 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (207 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 680 kg more than 2006 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler 300 (569 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler 300 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6059 cc | 4014 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 429 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 569 Nm | 323 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1888 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 74 L |