2007 Chrysler 300 vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 2,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler 300 (189 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2012 Honda CR-V. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda CR-V.
Because 2007 Chrysler 300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Honda CR-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler 300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Chrysler 300. (259 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler 300 | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | 300 | CR-V |
Year Released | 2007 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2701 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 259 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 58 L |