2007 Chrysler 300 vs. 2012 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2012 Nissan Armada is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler 300 (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Armada. (317 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Armada.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler 300 (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Armada. (521 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2007 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler 300 | 2012 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | 300 | Armada |
Year Released | 2007 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6059 cc | 5600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 521 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5276 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2014 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3129 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 106 L |