2007 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1966 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2007 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler Aspen (235 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1966 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1966 ZAZ 966.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler Aspen (407 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2007 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Chrysler Aspen | 1966 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Chrysler | ZAZ |
| Model | Aspen | 966 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2170 mm |
