2007 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2007 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler Aspen (235 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler Aspen (407 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler Aspen | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Aspen | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2480 mm |