2007 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1976 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 2007 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler Aspen (235 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Because 2007 Chrysler Aspen is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Mazda RX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Aspen will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler Aspen (407 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler Aspen | 1976 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Aspen | RX-3 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1976 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 65 L |