2007 Chrysler Aspen vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Chrysler Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Chrysler Aspen would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler Aspen (235 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2010 Jaguar XF. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Because 2007 Chrysler Aspen is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Aspen will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Chrysler Aspen. (407 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Chrysler Aspen.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler Aspen | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Aspen | XF |
Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 450 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 70 L |