2007 Chrysler Aspen vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Chrysler Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Chrysler Aspen would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2007 Chrysler Aspen. (235 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2007 Chrysler Aspen.
Because 2007 Chrysler Aspen is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Lotus Evora. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Aspen will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler Aspen (407 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Lotus Evora. (350 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2007 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler Aspen | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | Aspen | Evora |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2047 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2575 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 13.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 60 L |