2007 Chrysler Aspen vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Chrysler Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Chrysler Aspen would be higher.
Because 2007 Chrysler Aspen is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Cooper. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Aspen will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler Aspen (407 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2007 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper. 2007 Chrysler Aspen has automatic transmission and 2013 Mini Cooper has manual transmission. 2013 Mini Cooper will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Chrysler Aspen will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler Aspen | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Chrysler | Mini |
Model | Aspen | Cooper |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2547 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 50 L |