2007 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2007 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2007 Chrysler Crossfire. (216 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2007 Chrysler Crossfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 390 kg more than 2007 Chrysler Crossfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler Crossfire | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Crossfire | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2007 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 40 L |