2007 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2007 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler Crossfire (216 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 543 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler Crossfire | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Crossfire | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2007 | 1972 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2210 mm |