2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2001 Nissan HyperMini
To start off, 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan HyperMini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan HyperMini would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 720 kg more than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Because 2001 Nissan HyperMini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Nissan HyperMini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager (278 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. (130 Nm). This means 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2001 Nissan HyperMini | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Grand Voyager | HyperMini |
Year Released | 2007 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 2988 cc |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 278 Nm | 130 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2005 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 2670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 1900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 76 L |