2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager (172 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 950 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager (278 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Grand Voyager | Clio |
Year Released | 2007 | 2005 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2020 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2000 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |