2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 359 more horse power than 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (360 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Grand Voyager | CLS |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 507 HP |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 630 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 80 L |
