2007 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 1996 Toyota Conquest

To start off, 2007 Chrysler Pacifica is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Conquest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Conquest would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler Pacifica (201 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1996 Toyota Conquest. (174 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Pacifica should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota Conquest. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 504 kg more than 1996 Toyota Conquest. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler Pacifica (319 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Toyota Conquest. (135 Nm). This means 2007 Chrysler Pacifica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Toyota Conquest.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Chrysler Pacifica 1996 Toyota Conquest
Make Chrysler Toyota
Model Pacifica Conquest
Year Released 2007 1996
Engine Size 3778 cc 1973 cc
Horse Power 201 HP 174 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 319 Nm 135 Nm
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 1116 kg
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2740 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]