2007 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2000 Lotus M250

To start off, 2007 Chrysler Pacifica is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus M250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus M250 would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler Pacifica (205 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2000 Lotus M250. (176 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Pacifica should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus M250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 945 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2007 Chrysler Pacifica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lotus M250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Pacifica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler Pacifica (319 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus M250. (180 Nm). This means 2007 Chrysler Pacifica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus M250. 2007 Chrysler Pacifica has automatic transmission and 2000 Lotus M250 has manual transmission. 2000 Lotus M250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Chrysler Pacifica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: