2007 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2007 Chrysler Pacifica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (239 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2007 Chrysler Pacifica. (201 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2007 Chrysler Pacifica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 300 kg more than 2007 Chrysler Pacifica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (382 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Chrysler Pacifica. (319 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Chrysler Pacifica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Chrysler Pacifica | 2004 Mercury Mountaineer | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
| Model | Pacifica | Mountaineer |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3778 cc | 4604 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 239 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 85 L |
