2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 1997 Volvo S70
To start off, 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Volvo S70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Volvo S70 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser (150 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1997 Volvo S70. (124 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1997 Volvo S70.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser (225 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Volvo S70. (170 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Volvo S70.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 1997 Volvo S70 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | PT Cruiser | S70 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1997 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101.1 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 68 L |