2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 2005 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser (231 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Sable. (201 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 97 kg more than 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser (332 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Sable. (281 Nm). This means 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Sable.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser 2005 Mercury Sable
Make Chrysler Mercury
Model PT Cruiser Sable
Year Released 2007 2005
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2429 cc 2964 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 231 HP 201 HP
Torque 332 Nm 281 Nm
Engine Bore Size 87 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 101 mm 80 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.1:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1407 kg 1504 kg
Vehicle Length 4300 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.7 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.2 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.2 L/100km 10.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 L 68 L