2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser weights approximately 744 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser (286 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Chrysler | Smart |
Model | PT Cruiser | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 286 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1564 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 33 L |