2007 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2004 Saturn L
To start off, 2007 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Saturn L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Saturn L would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler Sebring (173 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2004 Saturn L. (141 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2004 Saturn L.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler Sebring (225 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Saturn L. (203 Nm). This means 2007 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Saturn L.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler Sebring | 2004 Saturn L | |
Make | Chrysler | Saturn |
Model | Sebring | L |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 2196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 141 HP |
Torque | 225 Nm | 203 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.4 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 59 L |