2007 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2008 Acura CSX
To start off, 2008 Acura CSX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2007 Chrysler Sebring. (173 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 2007 Chrysler Sebring.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2007 Chrysler Sebring has automatic transmission and 2008 Acura CSX has manual transmission. 2008 Acura CSX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Chrysler Sebring will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler Sebring | 2008 Acura CSX | |
Make | Chrysler | Acura |
Model | Sebring | CSX |
Year Released | 2007 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.4 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |