2007 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2011 Tata Nano
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler Voyager (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2011 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 2011 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 1440 kg more than 2011 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Chrysler Voyager (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Tata Nano. 2007 Chrysler Voyager has automatic transmission and 2011 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2011 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Chrysler Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Chrysler Voyager | 2011 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Chrysler | Tata |
| Model | Voyager | Nano |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 105 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2040 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 37 L |
