2007 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 106 more horse power than 2007 Chrysler Voyager. (172 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2007 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 2012 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Chrysler Voyager. (278 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Chrysler Voyager | 2012 Holden Calais | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Voyager | Calais |
Year Released | 2007 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3299 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 278 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |