2007 Citroen C1 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2007 Citroen C1 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2007 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2007 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 915 kg more than 2007 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Citroen C1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Citroen C1 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C1 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 244 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 78.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.6 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 64 L |