2007 Citroen C2 vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 2007 Citroen C2 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,360 cc, 2007 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Citroen C2 (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66.
Because 1979 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Citroen C2 (150 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2007 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Citroen C2 | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C2 | 66 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1289 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1550 mm |