2007 Citroen C6 vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2007 Citroen C6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Citroen C6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Citroen C6 (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Citroen C6 should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Citroen C6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Citroen C6 (370 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2007 Citroen C6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Citroen C6 | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C6 | 66 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2179 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 370 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1550 mm |