2007 Dodge Caliber vs. 1965 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2007 Dodge Caliber is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2007 Dodge Caliber. (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2007 Dodge Caliber.
Because 1965 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Caliber, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Dodge Caliber. (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1965 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Dodge Caliber.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Dodge Caliber | 1965 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Caliber | MK X |
Year Released | 2007 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 63 L |