2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,522 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (791 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 756 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (800 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 719 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Charger RT Concept | Fronte |
Year Released | 2007 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 3522 cc | 785 cc |
Horse Power | 791 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 800 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 260 km/hour | 115 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |