2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept vs. 1987 Mercedes-Benz 300
To start off, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 3,522 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (791 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 606 more horse power than 1987 Mercedes-Benz 300. (185 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept should accelerate faster than 1987 Mercedes-Benz 300.
Because 1987 Mercedes-Benz 300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Mercedes-Benz 300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (800 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 540 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Mercedes-Benz 300. (260 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Mercedes-Benz 300.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept | 1987 Mercedes-Benz 300 | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Charger RT Concept | 300 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3522 cc | 2962 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 791 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 800 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 260 km/hour | 207 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6 seconds | 9.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9 L/100km | 15 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |