2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept vs. 2002 Ford Ka
To start off, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ka would be higher. At 3,522 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (791 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 732 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka.
Because 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (800 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 695 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ka. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept | 2002 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Charger RT Concept | Ka |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3522 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 791 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 800 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.2:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 260 km/hour | 154 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6 seconds | 15.4 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
