2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept vs. 2004 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (791 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 496 more horse power than 2004 Jaguar XJ. (295 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept should accelerate faster than 2004 Jaguar XJ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (800 Nm) has 389 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jaguar XJ. (411 Nm). This means 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jaguar XJ. 2004 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept has manual transmission. 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept | 2004 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Charger RT Concept | XJ |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3522 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 791 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 800 Nm | 411 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |