2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (791 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 546 more horse power than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (800 Nm) has 417 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (383 Nm). This means 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Dodge | Toyota |
| Model | Charger RT Concept | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3522 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 791 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 800 Nm | 383 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
