2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept vs. 2005 Lancia Musa

To start off, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lancia Musa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lancia Musa would be higher. At 3,522 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (791 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 722 more horse power than 2005 Lancia Musa. (69 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept should accelerate faster than 2005 Lancia Musa.

Because 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lancia Musa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (800 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 620 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lancia Musa. (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lancia Musa.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept 2005 Lancia Musa
Make Dodge Lancia
Model Charger RT Concept Musa
Year Released 2007 2005
Body Type Sedan Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3522 cc 1248 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 791 HP 69 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 800 Nm 180 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 1750 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 18.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Top Speed 260 km/hour 159 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 6 seconds 15.4 seconds
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.2 L/100km 5.3 L/100km