2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept vs. 2006 Peugeot 307
To start off, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Peugeot 307. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Peugeot 307 would be higher. At 3,522 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (791 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 616 more horse power than 2006 Peugeot 307. (175 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept should accelerate faster than 2006 Peugeot 307.
Because 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 307, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (800 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 598 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Peugeot 307. (202 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Peugeot 307.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept | 2006 Peugeot 307 | |
Make | Dodge | Peugeot |
Model | Charger RT Concept | 307 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3522 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 791 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 800 Nm | 202 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 260 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6 seconds | 9.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 9 L/100km |