2007 Dodge Dakota vs. 1962 Ford Popular
To start off, 2007 Dodge Dakota is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Popular. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Popular would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1962 Ford Popular. (31 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Popular. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 1040 kg more than 1962 Ford Popular. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Popular. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Dodge Dakota | 1962 Ford Popular | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Dakota | Popular |
Year Released | 2007 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 31 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2220 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 55 L |