2007 Dodge Durango vs. 1966 Mercury Cyclone

To start off, 2007 Dodge Durango is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cyclone. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cyclone would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cyclone is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cyclone (335 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2007 Dodge Durango. (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cyclone should accelerate faster than 2007 Dodge Durango. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Dodge Durango weights approximately 711 kg more than 1966 Mercury Cyclone.

Because 2007 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Mercury Cyclone. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Cyclone (579 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Dodge Durango. (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Cyclone will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Dodge Durango.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Dodge Durango 1966 Mercury Cyclone
Make Dodge Mercury
Model Durango Cyclone
Year Released 2007 1966
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3701 cc 6393 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 210 HP 335 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 319 Nm 579 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3200 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 7 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 2343 kg 1632 kg
Vehicle Length 5110 mm 4980 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1890 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 2950 mm