2007 Dodge Nitro vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2007 Dodge Nitro is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Nitro (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Nitro should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Nitro (360 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Artic. (325 Nm). This means 2007 Dodge Nitro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Artic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Dodge Nitro | 2000 Ford Artic | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Nitro | Artic |
Year Released | 2007 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3952 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 325 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 68 L |