2007 Dodge Ram vs. 2002 Rover 75
To start off, 2007 Dodge Ram is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Rover 75 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Ram (216 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2002 Rover 75. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2002 Rover 75.
Because 2007 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Ram (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2007 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Dodge Ram | 2002 Rover 75 | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Ram | 75 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.7 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2760 mm |