2007 Dodge Ram vs. 2005 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2007 Dodge Ram is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Explorer would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Ram (235 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2005 Ford Explorer. (210 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Explorer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1063 kg more than 2005 Ford Explorer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Ram (408 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Explorer. (330 Nm). This means 2007 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Explorer.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Dodge Ram | 2005 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Ram | Explorer |
Year Released | 2007 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 4014 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 330 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 84 mm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 85 L |