2007 Dodge Ram vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2007 Dodge Ram is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 5 would be higher. At 5,883 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Ram (325 HP @ 2900 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Because 2007 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Ram (827 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 626 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2007 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Dodge Ram | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | 5 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5883 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 2900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 827 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102.1 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 119.9 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.2:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 60 L |