2007 Dodge Ram vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Dodge Ram would be higher. Both 2007 Dodge Ram and 2008 Jeep Commander are equipped with a 5,654 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 662 kg more than 2007 Dodge Ram.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Ram (509 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Commander. (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Dodge Ram | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | Ram | Commander |
Year Released | 2007 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 509 Nm | 500 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 2412 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6300 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.8 L/100km | 15.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 78 L |