2007 Dodge Ram vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Ram (345 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2009 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Commodore.
Because 2007 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2007 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore. 2007 Dodge Ram has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Dodge Ram will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Dodge Ram | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Ram | Commodore |
Year Released | 2007 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 509 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.8 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |